Organising evidence. Supporting decisions.
This is the page that sentence belongs on. If you are a compliance officer deciding whether DDP can be relied on, everything below is written for you — how the record is kept, who is accountable for each decision, and what the platform deliberately does not do.
One vocabulary, public site and console alike
Four states. A buyer reading a supply sheet and an operator reading the desk are reading the same words, in the same colours. Nothing outside this list is tinted.
Cleared — buyers can see it
A named person must act
Logged, no action yet
Does not apply to this batch
Who is accountable for what
Every clearance carries a named person and a timestamp. No batch reaches a buyer unless someone cleared it, and no decision is recorded by anyone who has not opened the document.
- A document is cleared by a named reviewer, never by the system. The reviewer is taken from the signed-in session, not chosen by whoever is writing.
- A document must arrive undecided. Creating one that is already accepted is refused by the database, not by the screen.
- No decision without reading it. The reviewer must have opened the document, and every change of state carries a written reason — including taking a decision back.
- Farms see their own trail in Thai, in the portal they already use.
What DDP does not do
Stating the limits plainly is part of being trustworthy. These are deliberate.
Request a sample dossier
A real cleared batch with names and dates redacted — the exact document set your regulator would receive. Licensed importers and pharmacies only.